Philosopher

al-Ghazali

c. 1056 – 1111

Also known as Algazel, Abu Hamid Muhammad al-Ghazali

Sunni theologian, jurist and mystic whose Incoherence of the Philosophers condemned key doctrines of the Aristotelian philosophers while adopting their logic.

Sketch of a bearded man with a high forehead
Kahlil Gibran, 1917, an imagined portrait.Kahlil Gibran · Public domain · See the original

The thirst for knowledge was innate in me from an early age; it was like a second nature implanted by God, without any will on my part.

Deliverance from Error, opening section, translated by Claud Field

Born in Ṭūs in north-eastern Iran, al-Ghazali studied at the Niẓāmiyya college in Nishapur and in 1091 was appointed to the prestigious Niẓāmiyya in Baghdad. In 1095 a personal crisis led him to leave his post and spend years as a Sufi, a turn he describes in his autobiography, Deliverance from Error.

In The Incoherence of the Philosophers he criticised twenty positions of the falsafa tradition of Avicenna and his followers, condemning three as unbelief: that the world is eternal, that God does not know particular things, and that there is no bodily resurrection. Yet he accepted their logic and much of their science. His critique provoked Averroes’ reply, The Incoherence of the Incoherence.

Key ideas

The Incoherence of the Philosophers
Al-Ghazālī criticised twenty positions of the philosophers. Most he judged merely wrong, but three of Avicenna’s were unbelief, contradicting revelation. These were that the world has no beginning, that God knows only universals, and that souls never return to bodies.
Cause and effect aren’t necessarily connected
“The connection between what is habitually believed to be a cause and what is habitually believed to be an effect is not necessary.” It comes from God’s decision to create them side by side, so the miracles reported in the Qur’an are possible.
Reason and revelation
“A [valid] rational demonstration is never wrong”, so it can’t truly conflict with revelation. Where it contradicts the literal text (proving, say, that God can’t have a “hand”), the text must be read allegorically. Almost all later Muslim theologians accepted this approach.
Logic within theology
Even as he condemned some of their teachings, al-Ghazali accepted the philosophers’ method of demonstration. With him began the introduction of Aristotelian, and especially Avicennan, philosophy into Muslim theology.
Region
Persia and Iraq

Influences

Influenced by

al-Ghazalic. 1056 – 1111

Influenced

Influenced by

al-Ghazalic. 1056 – 1111

Influenced

Key works

  • The Incoherence of the Philosophers (Tahafut al-falasifa)
  • The Revival of the Religious Sciences (Ihya’ ‘ulum al-din)
  • Deliverance from Error (al-Munqidh min al-dalal)

Sources

  1. Frank Griffel, al-Ghazali, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy