Philosopher

W. V. O. Quine

1908–2000

Also known as Willard Van Orman Quine

Harvard logician and philosopher who attacked logical empiricism's distinction between analytic and synthetic truths and saw philosophy as continuous with science.

Colour photograph of a smiling bald man in glasses on the deck of a sailing ship
Photograph by Maryclaire Quine aboard the Bluenose II in Halifax harbour, 1980.Photo: Maryclaire Quine · CC BY 4.0 · See the original

Science is not a substitute for common sense but an extension of it.

The Scope and Language of Science, p. 229

Quine was born in Akron, Ohio, in 1908. He studied mathematics at Oberlin College and wrote his Harvard doctorate on Whitehead and Russell’s Principia Mathematica. A travelling fellowship in 1932–33 took him to Vienna, Warsaw and Prague, where Rudolf Carnap, whose logical empiricism he would later attack, was then teaching.

He taught at Harvard from 1936 until 1978, apart from wartime service in naval intelligence, and wrote extensively on logic and set theory as well as on knowledge, language and ontology. His arguments of the early 1950s against logical empiricism, and his view that philosophy is continuous with natural science, have been extremely influential. He died in Boston on Christmas Day 2000.

Key ideas

Naturalism
It is “within science itself, and not in some prior philosophy, that reality is to be identified and described”. There is no first philosophy standing outside science; philosophy is in the same line of work, only more theoretical.
Against the analytic–synthetic distinction
Logical empiricists explained logic and mathematics as analytic, true by virtue of meaning. Quine rejected this, and after his work of the early 1950s philosophers could no longer take logical empiricism for granted.
Holism
Almost none of our knowledge faces experience one sentence at a time; a sentence is accepted for its contribution to our theory as a whole. Arithmetic seems a priori only because it lies near the centre of the “web of belief”, where giving it up would mean abandoning almost everything.
Ontology from theory
Our best theory, recast in first-order logic, tells us what exists: the objects its variables range over. For Quine these are physical objects, the contents of any portion of space-time, and sets.
Indeterminacy of translation
There may be different ways of translating a language that are equally correct and not mere stylistic variants of one another. Critics have called the idea absurd, or an extreme scepticism about whether we ever understand each other.
Tradition
Western
Region
United States

Influences

Where these links come from
  • W. V. O. Quine drew on Alfred North Whitehead. Source: Peter Hylton and Gary Kemp, Willard Van Orman Quine, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • W. V. O. Quine drew on Bertrand Russell. Source: Peter Hylton and Gary Kemp, Willard Van Orman Quine, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • W. V. O. Quine drew on and argued against Rudolf Carnap. Source: Peter Hylton and Gary Kemp, Willard Van Orman Quine, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Key works

  • Two Dogmas of Empiricism, 1951
  • From a Logical Point of View, 1953
  • Word and Object, 1960
  • Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, 1969
  • Pursuit of Truth, 1990

Sources

  1. Peter Hylton and Gary Kemp, Willard Van Orman Quine, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy