Philosopher

Tanabe Hajime

1885–1962

Also known as Hajime Tanabe

Nishida's colleague and critic in the Kyoto School, who rethought absolute nothingness as 'absolute mediation' and, after the war, wrote a philosophy of repentance, Philosophy as Metanoetics.

Since the absolute, as nothingness, must act as an absolute mediating force, it presupposes relative being as its medium.

Philosophy as Metanoetics, p. 23 in the English translation, translation as quoted by Bret W. Davis

Tanabe Hajime was, with Nishida Kitarō and Nishitani Keiji, one of the three most prominent members of the Kyoto School, and is often considered its co-founder. He studied with Heidegger in the early 1920s and on his return in 1924 became the first scholar anywhere to write an article on Heidegger’s thought. His own method was intensely dialectical, developed through a long study of Hegel.

His 1930 essay “Requesting Instruction from Professor Nishida”, sharply criticising his colleague, is seen by many as the moment the Kyoto School became more than a circle of Nishida’s disciples. He later applied his “logic of the specific” to argue for the Japanese nation-state as a model for others. Towards the end of the war he renounced these claims, and Philosophy as Metanoetics, first given as lectures in 1944, called for self-critique from himself, the nation and human reason as such.

Key ideas

Against Nishida’s place of nothingness
Tanabe charged that Nishida’s “place of absolute nothingness” was a kind of Plotinian emanation resting on mystical intuition, crossing the line from philosophy into religion, and that as an unchanging basis it fell back into a metaphysics of being.
Absolute mediation
Absolute nothingness is not an enveloping place but a movement of absolute negation. It works only through relative beings, so the absolute needs the relative, and nothingness needs being, as much as the reverse.
The logic of the specific
Between the individual and universal humanity stands the “specific”, the ethnic community; the nation-state gives it rational form. Tanabe went on to cast Japan as an archetype for other nations, a step critics call inconsistent with his own logic.
Metanoetics
Reason, pressing its own power, runs into contradictions and must repeatedly die to itself, to be reborn through what Tanabe, borrowing the language of Shinran’s Pure Land Buddhism, called “Other-power”. Philosophy becomes a way of repentance (zangedō), for the philosopher and the nation alike.
Tradition
Japanese
Region
Kyoto

Influences

Where these links come from
  • Tanabe Hajime drew on G. W. F. Hegel. Source: Bret W. Davis, The Kyoto School, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Tanabe Hajime drew on and argued against Nishida Kitarō. Source: Bret W. Davis, The Kyoto School, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Tanabe Hajime studied with Martin Heidegger. Source: Bret W. Davis, The Kyoto School, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Key works

  • Philosophy as Metanoetics (Zangedō toshite no tetsugaku)
  • Requesting Instruction from Professor Nishida, 1930

Sources

  1. Bret W. Davis, The Kyoto School, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy